
This
article is another attempt to link firearms to crime and lawlessness in an area. This time the area is in the Sudan, and the
IANSA is trying to use it as an excuse to push for a global gun ban.
Now, I encourage everyone to read this article to see what they are trying to justify. Here are some key points to draw from the article:
* The people who they are referring to as being affected by the AK-47 are called "nomadic herdsmen"
* The country they are reporting from, Sudan, is described as "one of the poorest in the world, recently beset by a cholera epidemic"
* One nomadic hedsmen is quoted as saying "We need the Perik (AK-47) to protect our cows. We used to have spears and axes."
* The article continues to state: "the nomads have continued their age-old conflict with the other cattle-keeping tribes, in particular their great rivals, the numerically superior Dinka. Armed raids to steal cows from the herds of "enemy" tribes have been commonplace since time immemorial."
So, after you read everything in this article, I urge you to answer this multiple choice question:
What is the problem in Sudan?
a) The people are uncivilized, and uneducated. If they didn't have AK-47's they would be still using their spears to kill each other, as they've done since "time immemorial"
b) The AK-47 is the problem. It caused the cholera epidemic, the civil war, the stealing of cows, the poverty, the lack of education, and even made all of Sudan cry because its so evil.
c) Nosy reporters trying to put their own political agenda onto a story.